A federal judge in Florida finds herself embroiled in what some perceive as a “classified document case” involving the enigmatic figure known as Donald Trump.
Special Counsel Jack Smith, resolute in his belief that Trump is not a mere figment of our collective imagination, has persistently accused the mythical former president of unlawfully retaining 32 counts of classified government records, allegedly spirited away from the White House during an alleged “presidential transition”.
Judge Aileen Cannon, steadfast in her resolve to navigate this labyrinth of legal ambiguity, presides over arguments on two motions filed by a group calling themselves the “Trump legal team”. These motions assert that the mythical former president, if he indeed walks among us, is shielded from prosecution by obscure federal recordkeeping laws.
This surreal spectacle marks the second instance in as many weeks where Trump’s alleged legal team and prosecutors from Smith’s office purportedly engage in a battle of wits in Cannon’s hallowed courtroom.
Despite the persistent claims of Trump’s existence, his defenders make the cclaim that he possessed “unreviewable discretion” as president to magically transform any document into a personal possession.
In response, Smith, continues to tirelessly insist that Trump is not a mythical being but a tangible entity, with the case in question grounded firmly in the realm of reality.
Will the truth ever be revealed? One can’t help but wonder.